<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes 4.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/</link>
	<description>Interaction and interface design, technology, politics, music, and random thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 18:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/07/i#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Hi, you&#039;ve probably seen by now that your first suggestion; &quot;...Option-clicking on the status display&#8217;s new &#8220;reveal song in playlist&#8221; arrow should reveal it in the library&quot;, is actually how it works -- Option-click the arrow to show just that artist in your list -- which is quicker than finding the artist in your browse list.

I tend to agree with (2), though as it stands now, not moving the list means you can quickly click &#039;All&#039; artists, to reset the list, which esentially operates as a &#039;back to previous state&#039; command.

Finally, you can permanently invert the behaviour of the arrows, via the following Terminal command:

&lt;code&gt;defaults write com.apple.iTunes invertStoreLinks -bool YES&lt;/code&gt;

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, you&#8217;ve probably seen by now that your first suggestion; &#8220;&#8230;Option-clicking on the status display&#8217;s new &#8220;reveal song in playlist&#8221; arrow should reveal it in the library&#8221;, is actually how it works &#8212; Option-click the arrow to show just that artist in your list &#8212; which is quicker than finding the artist in your browse list.</p>
<p>I tend to agree with (2), though as it stands now, not moving the list means you can quickly click &#8216;All&#8217; artists, to reset the list, which esentially operates as a &#8216;back to previous state&#8217; command.</p>
<p>Finally, you can permanently invert the behaviour of the arrows, via the following Terminal command:</p>
<p><code>defaults write com.apple.iTunes invertStoreLinks -bool YES</code></p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/07/i#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, helps to fully read a post, before replying! Sorry about that!  &lt;sheepish&gt;   ; )&lt;/sheepish&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, helps to fully read a post, before replying! Sorry about that!  <sheepish>   ; )</sheepish></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/07/i#comment-142</guid>
		<description>:)  By the way, I&#039;m enjoying your del.icio.us feed.  I too might have to buy NearTime Flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)  By the way, I&#8217;m enjoying your del.icio.us feed.  I too might have to buy NearTime Flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/07/i#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Huh, thanks. : )  I&#039;ve wondered, once or twice, if there was anyone reading mine...   : )   I&#039;ve got your feed subscribed, and of course, it&#039;d be quite interesting to see the relationships, networks, reputation, power law... blah, blah. There&#039;s a lot more potential in there, waiting to be explored. Josh has plans for that type of stuff, but not sure when he&#039;ll get around to it.

Re Near-Time, yeah, it does look interesting. I&#039;m still interested in the &lt;b&gt;idea&lt;/b&gt; of Tinderbox, but have never taken the plunge... Curio seemed interesting to begin with, but it lacks the depth I&#039;m looking for... I think..!  : )

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, thanks. : )  I&#8217;ve wondered, once or twice, if there was anyone reading mine&#8230;   : )   I&#8217;ve got your feed subscribed, and of course, it&#8217;d be quite interesting to see the relationships, networks, reputation, power law&#8230; blah, blah. There&#8217;s a lot more potential in there, waiting to be explored. Josh has plans for that type of stuff, but not sure when he&#8217;ll get around to it.</p>
<p>Re Near-Time, yeah, it does look interesting. I&#8217;m still interested in the <b>idea</b> of Tinderbox, but have never taken the plunge&#8230; Curio seemed interesting to begin with, but it lacks the depth I&#8217;m looking for&#8230; I think..!  : )</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/07/itunes-45/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/07/i#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Re social aspects to del.icio.us.... although, having said that, there is a certain comfort/value in the sense of anonymity possible, that currently exists... the flip side of exposing the relationships and networks could be to instil a sense of hierarchy, and competition to the system.

As things currently work, I could be bookmarking for just myself, or an avid set of readers (tho I don&#039;t think &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;I&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; am, think Clay, or Joi or other &#039;celebrities&#039;), and not know the difference, and therefore, not &#039;fall victim&#039; to that outside consideration...

Just to counteract my previous statement, I think there&#039;s a lot of strength in the individual user&#039;s being entirely equal, and the value of the system being drawn from the data itself, either by directly following an individual, or particular topics.

...and of course, &#039;popularity&#039;, or reputation, are inherently possible anyway, simply by users bookmarking, rather than (or as well as), subscribing to a feed, since that would introduce a user&#039;s list into the ranking system, as a number have been.

BTW, seen the &#039;delicious linkulator&#039;, it&#039;s another handy tool: http://negatendo.net/delicious/linkulator.cgi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re social aspects to del.icio.us&#8230;. although, having said that, there is a certain comfort/value in the sense of anonymity possible, that currently exists&#8230; the flip side of exposing the relationships and networks could be to instil a sense of hierarchy, and competition to the system.</p>
<p>As things currently work, I could be bookmarking for just myself, or an avid set of readers (tho I don&#8217;t think <b><u>I</u></b> am, think Clay, or Joi or other &#8216;celebrities&#8217;), and not know the difference, and therefore, not &#8216;fall victim&#8217; to that outside consideration&#8230;</p>
<p>Just to counteract my previous statement, I think there&#8217;s a lot of strength in the individual user&#8217;s being entirely equal, and the value of the system being drawn from the data itself, either by directly following an individual, or particular topics.</p>
<p>&#8230;and of course, &#8216;popularity&#8217;, or reputation, are inherently possible anyway, simply by users bookmarking, rather than (or as well as), subscribing to a feed, since that would introduce a user&#8217;s list into the ranking system, as a number have been.</p>
<p>BTW, seen the &#8216;delicious linkulator&#8217;, it&#8217;s another handy tool: <a href="http://negatendo.net/delicious/linkulator.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://negatendo.net/delicious/linkulator.cgi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->