<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate 3: Kerry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/10/15/debate-3-kerry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/10/15/debate-3-kerry/</link>
	<description>Interaction and interface design, technology, politics, music, and random thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel J. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/10/15/debate-3-kerry/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 02:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/10/15/d#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Jared:

Military forces tasked to bringing Al Qaeda&#039;s leadership to justice were pulled out of Afghanistan to prepare for the invasion of Iraq.  This says to me that Bush was more concerned about Iraq and its mythical WMDs than he was about pursuing bin Laden and al-Zawahiri (the strategic mastermind).   If Bush is so eager to catch bin Laden, why did he invest most of the U.S. military&#039;s resources in Iraq, a country that was contained and posed little threat to anyone?  Of course Bush cares about catching bin Laden &#8212; the question is of priorities.  The leaders of the organization that killed almost 3,000 Americans or a delusional, toothless dictator?

If bin Laden &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; still running the show, it is obvious he was not sufficiently weakened to justify lowering the priority of capturing him.  Al Qaeda is blamed for the bombings in Madrid and Bali, and is suspected by the Israelis in the recent bombings across their border with Egypt.  Update (11/1/04): &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3972635.stm&quot; title=&quot;BBC News: No al-Qaeda hand in Egypt bombs&quot;&gt;The Egyptian government is denying any al Qaeda involvement&lt;/a&gt;, but the Israelis stand by their claims otherwise.

I did not &lt;q&gt;&quot;simply parrot the fudge semi-facts that the Kerry camp uses&quot;&lt;/q&gt;.  Kerry has repeatedly stated that 1.6 million jobs have been lost.  The actual number, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics information, is around 600,000 (net).  I don&#039;t drink Kool-Aid, be it red or blue.  The other statistics come from what are considered to be non-partisan sources like the Congressional Budget Office.  If you have evidence that any of the facts I enumerated are incorrect, please present it.

Please tell me why you support the Bush administration.  I would honestly like to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared:</p>
<p>Military forces tasked to bringing Al Qaeda&#8217;s leadership to justice were pulled out of Afghanistan to prepare for the invasion of Iraq.  This says to me that Bush was more concerned about Iraq and its mythical WMDs than he was about pursuing bin Laden and al-Zawahiri (the strategic mastermind).   If Bush is so eager to catch bin Laden, why did he invest most of the U.S. military&#8217;s resources in Iraq, a country that was contained and posed little threat to anyone?  Of course Bush cares about catching bin Laden &#8212; the question is of priorities.  The leaders of the organization that killed almost 3,000 Americans or a delusional, toothless dictator?</p>
<p>If bin Laden <em>is</em> still running the show, it is obvious he was not sufficiently weakened to justify lowering the priority of capturing him.  Al Qaeda is blamed for the bombings in Madrid and Bali, and is suspected by the Israelis in the recent bombings across their border with Egypt.  Update (11/1/04): <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3972635.stm" title="BBC News: No al-Qaeda hand in Egypt bombs">The Egyptian government is denying any al Qaeda involvement</a>, but the Israelis stand by their claims otherwise.</p>
<p>I did not <q>&#8220;simply parrot the fudge semi-facts that the Kerry camp uses&#8221;</q>.  Kerry has repeatedly stated that 1.6 million jobs have been lost.  The actual number, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics information, is around 600,000 (net).  I don&#8217;t drink Kool-Aid, be it red or blue.  The other statistics come from what are considered to be non-partisan sources like the Congressional Budget Office.  If you have evidence that any of the facts I enumerated are incorrect, please present it.</p>
<p>Please tell me why you support the Bush administration.  I would honestly like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared White</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/10/15/debate-3-kerry/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/10/15/d#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Whoops, my mistake. I read down further and saw where Bush said &quot;I truly am not that concerned about him.&quot; But it&#039;s obvious in the context of the comment that he&#039;s talking about bin Laden&#039;s ability to command another terror attack, not the importance of catching bin Laden and bringing him to justice. Of course Bush wants to catch bin Laden!

But, I guess you could say Bush wasn&#039;t quite accurate in his response to Kerry&#039;s statement, so I concede the point. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, my mistake. I read down further and saw where Bush said &#8220;I truly am not that concerned about him.&#8221; But it&#8217;s obvious in the context of the comment that he&#8217;s talking about bin Laden&#8217;s ability to command another terror attack, not the importance of catching bin Laden and bringing him to justice. Of course Bush wants to catch bin Laden!</p>
<p>But, I guess you could say Bush wasn&#8217;t quite accurate in his response to Kerry&#8217;s statement, so I concede the point. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared White</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/10/15/debate-3-kerry/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/10/15/d#comment-434</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, your commentary on what Bush said about Osama bin Laden is just as misleading as what Kerry said. Bush&#8217;s exact quote on the page you linked to (which is actually part of a much larger quote which I completely agree with) is:</p>
<p>&#8220;So I don&#8217;t know where he is.  You know, I just don&#8217;t spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you.  I&#8217;m more worried about making sure that our soldiers are well-supplied; that the strategy is clear; that the coalition is strong; that when we find enemy bunched up like we did in Shahikot Mountains, that the military has all the support it needs to go in and do the job, which they did.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where does Bush say he&#8217;s not concerned about bin Laden? He says he&#8217;s more worried about Y than X, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s not worried about X.</p>
<p>You say the facts aren&#8217;t on Bush&#8217;s side, and then you simply parrot the fudge semi-facts that the Kerry camp uses. So, like the debates, all we have here is the Kerry camp saying Kerry won, and the Bush camp saying Bush won. Since I&#8217;m voting for Bush, I&#8217;ll leave you to figure out my opinion. :)</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

