<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Membranophonist&#039;s Ramblings &#187; Mozilla</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/category/browsers/mozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com</link>
	<description>Interaction and interface design, technology, politics, music, and random thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Link Relationships</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/25/wordpress-link-relationships/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/25/wordpress-link-relationships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/05/25/w</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress could improve accessibility by automatically generating link relationships for individual post pages. <a href="http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/25/wordpress-link-relationships/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wordpress.org" title="A state-of-the-art semantic personal publishing platform">WordPress</a> (among other packages) could automatically generate rel=&#8221;prev&#8221; and &#8220;next&#8221; link tags to create post relationships and allow users to skim through a weblog&#8217;s entries using native supplemental browser navigation controls such as those found in <a href="http://www.opera.com/" title="Opera's combined browser/e-mail client/feed reader">Opera</a> and <a href="http://www.mozilla.org" title="An open source cross-platform browser that doesn't suck">Mozilla</a>.  There are currently no previous post/next post navigation links available on individual post pages, a minor feature I&#8217;ve missed since switching from MovableType.</p>
<p>Based on <a href="http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_9_providing_additional_navigation_aids.html" title="Dive Into Accessibility: Providing additional navigational aids">Day 9 of Mark Pilgrim&#8217;s &#8220;30 Days To A More Accessible Site&#8221;</a>, I assume these would also help make WordPress sites more accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/05/25/wordpress-link-relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Futures</title>
		<link>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/03/03/mozilla-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/03/03/mozilla-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wilsonet.com/wp-login.php/wp-admin/archives/category/meta-data/archives/category/wp-images/smilies/feed/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/16/wp-images/smilies/archives/2004/02/03/archives/2003/11/01/feed/archives/2004/02/archives/2004/03/03/m</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few things I'd like to see the Mozilla organization focus on for the future. <a href="http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/03/03/mozilla-futures/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/events/dev-day-feb-2004/mozilla-futures/" title="Mozilla Futures">An interesting presentation by Brendan Eich</a> (seems to require a Gecko-based browser for proper layout and navigation) discussing some possible future directions for the Mozilla project.</p>
<h4>What I&#8217;d like to see</h4>
<ul>
<li>Out-of-the-box <a href="http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/" title="W3: Scalable Vector Graphics">SVG</a> support</li>
<p>SVG is too cool to be languishing the way it is.  I&#8217;d have some spiffy graphics on my weblog if SVG were supported by anything other than custom builds of Mozilla and/or Firefox!  The potential for graphically rich, but bandwidth-friendly content could be realized by SVG.</p>
<li>Better native UI integration</li>
<p>I love the speed and extensibility of Firefox, but it just doesn&#8217;t feel right under OS X.  The XUL-based Gecko browsers fit a bit better with GNOME, but the native GTK+ browsers such as <a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/" title="The web browser for the GNOME Desktop">Epiphany</a> and <a href="http://galeon.sourceforge.net/" title="Galeon: the web, only the web">Galeon</a> still have a more integrated, organic feel.  In my experience, they feel even less natural when using KDE.</p>
<li>Easier <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/joy-of-xul.html" title="Mozilla.org: The Joy of XUL">XUL</a> for next-generation cross-platform Web apps</li>
<p>Beat Microsoft to the punch by allowing any platform (not just those running Longhorn) to run applications designed to deliver custom functions and services over a network.  There are a few out there, but I guess most developers either don&#8217;t know about XUL or find it too difficult to use.  Perhaps team up with major e-commerce sites to provide a custom shopping app written in XUL&#8230;  Break us out of the browser &#8211; it&#8217;s really not the best interface for many things.</p>
</ul>
<p>Given Microsoft&#8217;s direction with WVG and Indigo, I have a real concern that they will divide the Internet and its next-gen services into Those Who Use Longhorn and Those Who Do Not.  By providing great tools for authoring connected applications and content, the Mozilla organization can help maintain the openness of the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.wilsonet.com/archives/2004/03/03/mozilla-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

